You just won't believe how vastly hugely mind-mindbogglingly big it is. Realistically there will be no space battles but you'll need to prove me wrong with more than casual logic. ĭISCLAIMER: The only reason I didn't VTC this question as 100% opinion based is because I believe so fervently that my answer is the only realistic answer. While this is effective over time, ships can't dump energy more quickly than it's coming in due to. Yes, you can use energy weapons, railguns (although that's wasting ammo) and engines to dispel energy from shields.Generally the battle is already decided once it reaches orbit. Battles primarily occur within solar systems, but aren't usually in orbit of planets (at least, not planets you want to remain habitable).Ship drives produce output in the centigees.In case I missed anything, more information is available upon request.While shrapnel warheads exist, ships generally have enough armor for them to be ineffective.Most missile warheads are Casaba Howitzers or radiation-pumped lasers.Railguns are only effective at very close range, for the same reason as energy weapons.As a result, ships are rather weak to railguns. Shields do not block matter very efficiently.As a result, weapons fire is generally grouped in large salvos in order to minimize the amount of time the ship is exposed. The shields also have to be lowered to fire weapons out.Since shield capacitors aren't infinite in size (and it's rather hard to get rid of energy in space), they have to be lowered when the capacitors reach full capacity.Shields are a globular field around ships which capture 99% of energy that passes through them, storing it in capacitors.However, there are various kinds of active and passive countermeasures. Missiles have a long range and don't suffer as much from accuracy issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |